Bibliographic record
Abstract
The traces of Islam in the region of Buton Sultanate are rarely described by historians and preacher. This paper aims to explore the history of Islam in Buton. This article is result of a qualitative research with historical approach. The study found that the traces of Islam in the land of the Buton Sultanate can be known about the entry of Islamic teachings in the Buton which is able to change its system of government from a kingdom to a sultanate and also the traces of Islam left behind can continue through educational institutions. This was influenced by one of the figures who was very influential in the process of Islamization in the Buton Sultanate. Jejak islam yang berada di tanah kesultanan buton jarang untuk diketahui oleh sebagian ahli sejarawan yang berkecimpung didunia sejarah dan juga dakwah. Hal ini yang membuat penulis untuk memaparkan history mengenai jejak islam yang ada di tanah buton. Artikel ini merupakan penelitian jenis kualitatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan studi history sehingga jejak islam ditanah kesultanan buton bisa diketahui tentang masuknya ajaran islam yang ada ditanah buton yang mampu merubah sistem pemerintahannya dari kerajaan menjadi sebuah kesultanan dan juga jejak islam yang ditinggalkan dapat terus berlanjut melalui lembaga pendidikan. Hal ini dipengaruhi oleh salah satu tokoh yang sangat berpengaruh dalam proses islamisasi di tanah kesultanan buton
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".