MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3130009891

Favoriser la collaboration professionnelle avec les proches aidants : la nécessité d’établir un cadre juridique pour préciser leurs droits, leurs obligations et leur responsabilité civile

2020· article· fr· W3130009891 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dominique Giroux, Vanessa Roy, Véronique Provencher, Robert P. Kouri

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La determination du conge hospitalier d’une personne vulnerable necessite une collaboration etroite avec les proches aidants. Or ceux-ci se retrouvent souvent a assumer une grande part de responsabilite concernant l’assistance a fournir une fois de retour a domicile, sans qu’ils n’aient formellement consenti ni recu une formation adequate pour prodiguer de tels soins. Cette situation a des effets deleteres sur la sante des proches aidants. Une analyse du cadre juridique quebecois concernant les proches aidants revele que ce dernier est insuffisant pour les proteger adequatement. Cet essai vise a soulever des solutions novatrices a ce constat, soit la creation d’une loi particuliere precisant le statut de proche aidant et l’etablissement d’un cadre juridique precisant leurs droits, leurs obligations et les elements de leur responsabilite civile notamment en cas de faute commise par le proche aidant dans le cadre de son role. Abstract When a vulnerable person is discharged from hospital, there should be a close collaboration between the medical staff and the caregivers who will be looking after that person upon their release. Caregivers often find themselves having to take on greater responsibilities when their patients return home, yet they do so without having provided formal consent and without adequate training. This situation has deleterious effects on the caregivers’ health. An analysis of Quebec’s legal framework for caregivers reveals that they are not adequately protected. This article identifies some innovative solutions, including the creation of legislation recognizing the status of caregivers and establishing a legal framework that outlines their rights, obligations and civil liability (most notably in the case of malpractice by the caregiver).  Keywords: caregivers; rights and obligations; hospital discharge

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.008
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0020.012
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique socialeSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207