MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3130018796 · doi:10.1039/d1dt00120e

Gd<sup>3+</sup>-activated narrowband ultraviolet-B persistent luminescence through persistent energy transfer

2021· article· en· W3130018796 on OpenAlexaff
Xianli Wang, Yafei Chen, Peter Kner, Zhengwei Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
Canadian institutionsPetroleum Technology Research Centre
FundersKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsUltravioletPhosphorPersistent luminescenceEnergy transferLuminescenceUltraviolet bChemistryRadiochemistryMaterials sciencePhotochemistryAtomic physicsPhysicsOptoelectronicsThermoluminescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work reports the realization of Gd3+ persistent luminescence in the narrowband ultraviolet-B (NB-UVB; 310-313 nm) through persistent energy transfer from a sensitizer of Pr3+, Pb2+ or Bi3+. We propose a general design concept to develop Gd3+-activated NB-UVB persistent phosphors from Pr3+-, Pb2+- or Bi3+-activated ultraviolet-C (200-280 nm) or ultraviolet-B (280-315 nm) persistent phosphors, leading to the discovery of ten Gd3+ NB-UVB persistent phosphors such as Sr3Gd2Si6O18:Pr3+, Sr3Gd2Si6O18:Pb2+ and Y2GdAl2Ga3O12:Bi3+ as well as five ultraviolet-B persistent phosphors such as Y3Al2Ga3O12:Pr3+, Sr3Y2Si6O18:Pb2+ and Y3Al2Ga3O12:Bi3+. The persistent energy transfer from the sensitizers to Gd3+ is very efficient and the Gd3+ NB-UVB afterglow can last for more than 10 hours. This study expands the persistent luminescence research to the NB-UVB as well as the broader ultraviolet-B spectral regions. The NB-UVB persistent phosphors may act as self-sustained glowing NB-UVB radiation sources for dermatological therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicLuminescence Properties of Advanced MaterialsFrench-language works237,207