MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3130028436 · doi:10.3138/cras-2020-015

The Late Oedipal Genre, Thantagonists, and Secondary Televisuality

2021· article· en· W3130028436 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Adleman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuccessor cardinalNarrativeLiteratureWhite (mutation)HistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores a dominant turn-of-the-millennium televisual genre, the late Oedipal narrative. Late Oedipal narratives such as The Wire, The Sopranos, Deadwood, Mad Men, and Breaking Bad represent turbulent crises of sovereignty bound up with broader transitions in the spirit of the age. These crises are often connected to a change in the overriding media environment, which the late Oedipal genre tends to represent as a mortal challenge to atavistic, self-destructive “thantagonists” such as Jimmy McNulty, Tony Soprano, Al Swearengen, and Walter White. As such, the late Oedipal genre constitutes a recursive form of television about television as the medium is vacuumed up and remediated by its successor, the Internet. I refer to such palpable rearticulations of televisuality through the universal medium of the Internet as “secondary televisuality.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.029
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207