La fragilité dans la culture et les attentes spirituelles de l’individu contemporain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si le concept de fragilité prend tout naturellement sa place dans une réflexion d’ensemble sur le soin, il reste qu’il trouve des illustrations dans d’autres secteurs de la culture contemporaine. Écrivains, peintres ou musiciens traduisent à leur manière des attentes spirituelles d’aujourd’hui. Après avoir précisé la notion d’attente spirituelle en lien avec l’inquiétude actuelle, il s’agit ici d’interroger l’oeuvre de trois artistes pour mieux les relier à des aspirations plus larges. Si la romancière Sylvie Germain aide à mieux percevoir de telles attentes en termes de reconnaissance, d’écoute et d’éternité de la part des individus d’aujourd’hui, les toiles et la vie de Nicolas de Staël aident de leur côté à discerner celles-ci en termes de dépassement de soi, de corporéité et de gratuité. Le destin du pianiste Glenn Gould aide enfin à mieux percevoir ces demandes en termes de ritualité, de relation à la nature et de nomination du divin qui s’expriment désormais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".