MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3130192273

The impact of COVID- 19 pandemic on the Nigerian economy; A case study of the financial sector

2021· article· en· W3130192273 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mojibola Bamidele-Sadiq, Ehinmilorin Elisa, Bamidele-Sadiq Mojibola Opeyemi, Dominic Richard Ekpeno, Obikaonu Pauline Chimuru

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevenueBusinessProfitability indexGovernment (linguistics)Market capitalizationStock marketPandemicFinanceFinancial systemCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 impact on economic performance has attracted a lot of attention among policy maker’s stakeholders and the academic. This study was circumscribed to a discussion on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Nigerian economy with a particular focus on the financial sector. Adopting reliable secondary data, the study adopted the ex post facto research design to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on the banking institutions, the insurance industry, and the stock market in Nigeria. The result of the analysis indicates that the banking sector has been experiencing low profitability and downsizing to contain the increased cost resulting from the pandemic, whereas the insurance firms are losing revenue sources due to the reduction of premium from the major sectors that subscribe to insurance packages. The stock market decline in market share and low market capitalization are indicative of the negative impact of the COVID-19. Pragmatic and effective policy responses are required by the government to reduce the proliferation of the virus and hence foster growth in the financial sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Internet Banking and CommerceSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207