Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix With OHVIRA Syndrome: A Rare Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis (OHVIRA) syndrome is a rare Mullerian duct anomaly characterized by an obstructed hemivagina, ipsilateral renal agenesis, and uterine didelphys. There are only a few published case reports of OHVIRA syndrome, and cases of OHVIRA syndrome associated with cancer have rarely been reported. In fact, there is only one published report of a case with clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the cervix. Here, we report a case of CCC of the cervix with OHVIRA syndrome that underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy; we also provide a short literature review of this topic. A 52-year-old woman presented with abnormal vaginal bleeding for 1 month 2 years after menopause. A pelvic examination and preoperative imaging showed uterine didelphys, an obstructed hemivagina with a mass measuring approximately 2 cm located in her left cervix, and an absence of her left kidney. A colposcopy biopsy reported CCC of the cervix. Clinical staging classified her with stage IB1 disease. Abdominal radical hysterectomy was performed. Her left ectopic ureter led to the left cervix and opened in the endometrium, resulting in a so-called ectopic ureter. Macroscopic examination of the excised specimens showed two cervixes, two corpora of the uterus, and a tumor measuring 1.0 × 2.0 cm on the left cervix. In addition to typical OHVIRA symptoms including uterine didelphys, obstructed hemivagina, and renal agenesis, several anatomical variants were present. The current case included those variants as well as an atrophic kidney with an ectopic ureter to the obstructed hemivagina. Based on the results of our case, clinicians should be aware of the risks of cancer and anatomical variants associated with OHVIRA syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".