MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3130267911 · doi:10.1386/public_00029_1

HOOS: Scenes of Educational Hospitality

2020· article· en· W3130267911 on OpenAlexaffabout
Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Karen Meyer, Cynthia Nicol

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHospitalitySomaliRefugeeNarrativeReflection (computer programming)SociologyPedagogyPoetryDisplacement (psychology)PsychologyTourismArtHistoryLiteraturePsychoanalysisComputer sciencePhilosophyArchaeologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through narrative, poetry, photographs, and philosophical reflection, this essay attends to the possibilities and impossibilities of hospitality in encounters between particular Canadian teacher-educators, Somali student-teachers, and those hosting and facilitating their encounters in the Dadaab refugee camps in Kenya. The scenes of educational hospitality trouble the boundaries between host and guest, teacher and student, implacement and displacement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.013
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublicSame topicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesFrench-language works237,207