European Society of Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ESVCP) and European College of Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ECVCP) 11th Annual Congress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Objective: Ameloblastoma and acanthomatous ameloblastoma represent tumor originating from odontogenic epithelium without odontogenic mesenchyme. The aim of the study was to describe the cytological features of ameloblastoma and acanthomatous ameloblastoma, and to compare them with histological findings. Materials and Methods: Evaluation of cytological characteristics of oral masses histologically classified as tumors of odontogenic origin was performed. Oral neoplasia involved maxilla (7) and mandible (2). Nine dogs were included in the study. There were 3 mixed-breed dogs, and one each of the following breeds: Fox Terrier, Labrador Retriever, Bobtail, Schnauzer, Schipperkee, Shih-Tzu. Age ranged from 7 months to 17 years. Results: Histological diagnoses included acanthomatous ameloblastoma (6) and ameloblastoma (3). Cytological diagnoses included ameloblastoma (4), acanthomatous ameloblastoma (3), and one low-grade epithelial neoplasia. One sample was hemodiluted. Cytological examination of ameloblastomas revealed tightly packed clusters of small basaloid-type cells, as well as larger interdigitating neoplastic cells showing mild pleomorphism and minimal anisocytosis and anisokaryosis. In cases of acanthomatous ameloblastoma, cytological examination often revealed variably sized clusters of oval to polygonal cells, and sometimes variable nuclear:cytoplasmic maturation asynchrony with characteristics of squamous differentiation. Histologically ameloblastoma was characterized by islands of proliferating odontogenic epithelium with low nuclear atypia. In acanthomatous ameloblastoma cords of odontogenic epithelium showed a more plexiform pattern. Keratinization was sometimes present. Discussion and conclusion: The most striking characteristics of the odontogenic neoplasms consisted of tightly packed clusters of epithelial cells, oval to polygonal in shape. Some cellular atypia and asynchronous maturation of the nucleus and cytoplasm were more commonly detected in acanthomatous ameloblastoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.096 | 0.046 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".