Machine learning and deep learning for clinical data and PET/SPECT imaging in Parkinson's disease: a review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine Learning (ML) is a subfield of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that is increasingly applied to several medical diagnosis tasks, including a wide range of diseases. Importantly, various ML models were developed to address the complexity of Parkinson's Disease (PD) diagnosis. PD is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by motor and non‐motor disorders where its syndromes affect the daily lives of patients. Several Computer Aided Diagnosis and Detection (CADD) systems based on hand‐crafted ML algorithms achieved promising results in distinguishing PD patients from Healthy Control (HC) subjects and other Parkinsonian syndrome categories using clinical data (e.g., speech and gait impairments) and medical imaging [e.g., Position Emission Tomography (PET) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)]. Despite the good performance of hand‐crafted ML algorithms, there is still a problem linked to the features' extraction and selection. In fact, Deep Learning DL has provided an ultimate solution for the features' extraction and selection related issue. An important number of studies on the diagnosis of PD using DL algorithms were developed recently. This study provides an overview of the application of hand‐crafted ML algorithms and DL techniques for PD diagnosis. It also introduces key concepts for understanding the application of ML methods to diagnose PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".