Integration of SHM at an early stage in the design and construction of long-span bridges
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Automated monitoring systems are being increasingly used on long-span bridges to address a wide range of challenges, such as those encountered during the construction stage or those associated with maintenance and life-cycle optimization. Bridge designers are now more prepared than in the past to consider the use of SHM systems in their work from an early stage, and to support contractors in implementing such systems during the construction stage. Close coordination between bridge designers, contractors and SHM specialists enables the appropriate equipment to be integrated wisely in the construction process, and ensures that full advantage may be taken of the benefits that can be gained from the use of an SHM system, right from the start of the bridge’s life cycle. This can be particularly important, for example, where components of the SHM system require to be embedded in a structure’s concrete during the construction stage, or where the system will play a significant data measurement and assessment role in the construction process as a whole. This is illustrated with reference to current bridge construction projects in India and Canada.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it