MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3130423374 · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2021.02.019

Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Cardiac Mortality in High-Risk Kidney-Only and Simultaneous Pancreas−Kidney Transplant Recipients

2021· article· en· W3130423374 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wai H. Lim, Charmaine E. Lok, S. Joseph Kim, Greg Knoll, Baiju R. Shah, Kyla L. Naylor, Eric McArthur, Bin Luo, Stephanie N. Dixon, Carmel M. Hawley, Esther Ooi, Andrea K. Viecelli, Germaine Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of OttawaToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusKidney diseaseDialysisInternal medicineDiabetic nephropathyPopulationIncidence (geometry)Renal replacement therapyKidney transplantationTransplantationKidneyIntensive care medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) worldwide. In Canada, diabetes accounts for more than 30% of incident patients with kidney failure, with similar findings in Australia and other Western countries.1,2 Patients with diabetic kidney disease, regardless of stage or treatment, are at an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality, including those who have received kidney transplants.3 In patients with diabetes and advanced CKD or kidney failure, prevalent vascular disease often coexists with an excess of traditional CVD risk factors such as hyperlipidemia and hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney International ReportsSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207