RAM-Net: A Residual Attention MobileNet to Detect COVID-19 Cases from Chest X-Ray Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last century, we have passed two severe pandemics; the 1957 influenza (Asian flu) pandemic and the 1918 influenza (Spanish flu) pandemic with a high fatality rate. In the last few months, we have been again facing a new epidemic (COVID-19), which is a frighteningly high-risk disease and is globally threatening human lives. Among all attempts and presented solutions to tackle the COVID-19, a publicly available dataset of radiological imaging using chest radiography, also called chest X-ray (CXR) images, could efficiently accelerate the detection process of patients infected with COVID-19 through presented abnormalities in their chest radiography images. In this study, we have proposed a deep neural network (DNN), namely RAM-Net, a new combination of MobileNet with Dilated Depthwise Separable Convolution (DDSC), Residual blocks, and Attention augmented convolution. The network has been learned and validated using the COVIDx dataset, one of the most popular public datasets comprising the chest X-ray (CXR) images. Using this model, we could accurately identify the positive cases of COVID-19 viral infection while a new suspicious chest X-ray image is shown to the network. Our network's overall accuracy on the COVIDx test dataset was 95.33%, with a sensitivity and precision of 92% and 99% for COVID-19 cases, respectively, which are the highest results on the COVIDx dataset to date, to the best of our knowledge. Finally, we performed an audit on RAM-Net based on the Grad-CAM's interpretation to demonstrate that our proposed architecture detects SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) viral infection by focusing on vital factors rather than relying on irrelevant information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".