Diffusion of nitrogen in solid titanium at elevated temperature and the influence on the microstructure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nitrogen introduction to solid commercially pure titanium has been carried out at 1650 °C in an electric induction furnace using two different methods. An effective way to avoid the formation of the hard and brittle nitride layer (TiN and Ti2N) is reported. Microstructure and microhardness were examined on the cross-section of the nitrided samples. Multiple phase layers can be observed, and the phases in each layer were identified using X-ray Diffraction. The effects of the experimental conditions such as temperature and nitriding time on the kinetics of nitrogen diffusion were investigated. The nitrogen content within the samples was increased with increasing temperature and nitriding time. Correlations between microhardness and the nitrogen concentration have been developed for the phase(s) present in the core and the outer layers. The diffusion of nitrogen in solid titanium was simulated numerically, and the predicted nitrogen concentration profile in the rods and displacement of Ti–N phase interfaces show good agreement with the experimental observations. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and the numerical simulation results suggest that β phase boundary composition is 2.8 wt. % N, the α phase exists within the compositional range of 5.5–6.5 wt. % and the Ti–N phase within the compositional range 7.0–15.0 wt. %, which differs from data extracted from a published phase diagram.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it