MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract PS10-33: Analysis of factors associated with pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with HER2+ breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

2021· article· en· W3130697901 on OpenAlexaff
Neda Stjepanovic, Katarzyna J. Jerzak, Maureen Trudeau, Andrea Eisen, Sonal Gandhi, Ellen Warner, Danilo Giffoni M. M. Mata, Anthony Lott, Maria Luisa Romero, Sharon Lemon-Wong, Althea VanMassop, Xingshan Cao, William T. Tran, Rossanna C. Pezo

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerInternal medicineEpirubicinOncologyAnthracyclineTaxaneTrastuzumabDocetaxelCyclophosphamideChemotherapyCancerImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is associated with improved survival outcomes among women with HER2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer. We aimed to analyze the clinical, pathological and molecular factors associated with pCR in our series of HER2+ breast cancer patients. Methods: Between 2009 and 2019, breast cancer patients receiving NAC at our centre were enrolled in a prospective database. For this study we selected women with HER2+ unilateral breast cancer stages II or III who received anthracycline-taxane NAC regimens (with trastuzumab given concurrently with the taxane) and subsequently underwent breast and axillary surgery with curative intent. Medical charts of these 161 women were retrospectively reviewed to determine what clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics were associated with pCR using bivariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Of the 161 HER2+ women median age at diagnosis was 49 years (range 25-78) with 90 (56%) women under age 50. Total of 104 (65%) tumors were stage II, 108 (67%) expressed estrogen and/or progesterone receptors, 139 (86%) had HER2 3+ expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and 22 (14%) had HER2 IHC 2+ expression with amplified HER2 on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test. The NAC regimens were: Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Paclitaxel for 83 (52%) and Fluorouracil-Epirubicin-Cyclophosphamide-Docetaxel for 78 (48%) women. A total of 73 patients [45%; 44/108 HR+ (41%) and 29/53 HR- (55%)] achieved pCR (p=0.94). pCR rate among HER2 IHC 3+ tumors was 69/139 (50%), while for HER2 IHC 2+ tumors was 4/22 (18%). On bivariate analysis HER2 IHC 3+, absence of estrogen receptors and absence of progesterone receptors were predictive of pCR, while age, menopausal status, histologic subtype, tumor grade and NAC regimen were not. In the multivariate model only HER2 IHC 3+ expression remained a significant predictor of pCR (OR =4.443, 95% CI 1.376 - 14.344). Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that for HER2+ breast cancers treated with NAC with anthracycline-taxane and trastuzumab, HER2 IHC 3+ expression is associated with a higher rate of pCR compared to HER2 IHC 2+ expression with FISH amplification. Further analysis in a larger cohort is warranted. Citation Format: Neda Stjepanovic, Katarzyna Jerzak, Maureen Trudeau, Andrea Eisen, Sonal Gandhi, Ellen Warner, Danilo Giffoni MM Mata, Anthony Lott, Maria Romero, Sharon Lemon-Wong, Althea VanMassop, Xingshan Cao, William Tran, Rossanna Pezo. Analysis of factors associated with pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with HER2+ breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-33.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies→French-language works237,207→