MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3130699063 · doi:10.1101/2021.02.11.21251546

Prevalence of dementia in elderly age population of Barangay Bangkal, City

2021· preprint· en· W3130699063 on OpenAlexaff
Vikash Jaiswal, Maria Kezia Lourdes Pormento, Namrata Hange, Neguemadji Ngardig Ngaba, Manoj Kumar Reddy Somagutta, Inna Celina Apostol Dy, Saloni Savani, Sana Javed, Shavy Nagpal, Arushee Bhatnagar, Mohit Mohit, Annie Khanam Singh, Dattatreya Mukherjee, Ruchir Paladiya, Freda Q. Malanyaon

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaPopulationMedicineGerontologyDemographyStatistical significancePopulation based studyElderly peopleInternal medicineDiseaseEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Dementia, a significant cause of disability and dependency among older adults. The growing population of the elderly in the Philippines is expected to increase the prevalence of dementia in the country. Purpose This study aims to determine the prevalence of dementia in the elderly population of Barangay Bangkal, Makati City. Methods Descriptive cross-sectional community-based study was conducted to determine the prevalence of dementia in the elderly population of Barangay Bangkal, Makati City, aged 60 years and above over one month from mid-October to mid-November 2019. Data was collected with help of Mini-Mental State Examination – Philippines version (MMSE-P) to determine the cognitive status and diagnose dementia in elderly population. Results A total of 266 elderly adults participated in the study. Representatives of the study population were male (59.0%), married (68.0%), with an income of less than 5,000 peso (51.1%), working (64.3%), and with high school education (42.1%). The average age of the study population was 68.02 ( + 6.76) years. The average MMSE score of the participants was 27.05 ( + 3.94). The prevalence of dementia in the sample was 18.8%. Age, income, and level of education were associated with the MMSE score ( r □ = - 0.26, n = 266, p < 0.001, r □ = 0.23, n = 266, p < 0.001, and rs = 0.19, n = 266, p = 0.002, respectively). The findings for statistical significance do resonate with clinical significance as evident during administration of MMSE score. Conclusion Advancing age increases the risk for cognitive decline while higher income and education level prevent or delays the onset of dementia. Collaborative management between the medical education faculty & students, researchers, and local state health officials might address dementia in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→