Intrinsic Gating Behavior of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels Predetermines Regulation by Auxiliary β-subunits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Voltage-gated sodium (Nav) channels mediate rapid millisecond electrical signaling in excitable cells. Auxiliary subunits, β1-β4, are thought to regulate Nav channel function through covalent and/or polar interactions with the channel’ s voltage-sensing domains. How these interactions translate into the diverse and variable regulatory effects of β-subunits remains unclear. Here, we find that the intrinsic movement order of the voltage-sensing domains during channel gating is unexpectedly variable across Nav channel isoforms. This movement order dictates the channel’ s propensity for closed-state inactivation, which in turn modulates the actions of β1 and β3. We show that the differential regulation of skeletal muscle, cardiac, and neuronal Nav channels is explained by their variable levels of closed-state inactivation. Together, this study provides a unified mechanism for the regulation of all Nav channel isoforms by β1 and β3, which explains how the fixed structural interactions of auxiliary subunits can paradoxically exert variable effects on channel function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".