Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article est une réflexion sur la ou les fragilités des proches aidant(e)s. À partir d’une rencontre effectuée dans le cadre de ma recherche doctorale, je propose une description des fragilités vécues par une femme qui accompagne son partenaire en contexte de soins palliatifs et de fin de vie. Confrontée à la maladie et à la perte de son partenaire, cette femme prend à la fois conscience de sa propre finitude et de la signification qu’elle attribue à sa vie. Elle s’engage, volontairement et involontairement, dans une démarche de quête de sens jonglant entre la rupture et la redéfinition identitaire. Cette réflexion met également en relief le sentiment de solitude vécue par des proches aidant(e)s ainsi que la solidarité pouvant être ressentie grâce à la présence authentique d’une personne à l’écoute. L’article se termine par un appel à l’accompagnement humaniste et bienveillant des proches aidant(e)s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".