Cyclostratigraphic calibration of the Frasnian (Late Devonian) time scale (Western Alberta, Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Until now, the duration of the Frasnian Stage has remained very poorly constrained, hampering a detailed understanding of sedimentation processes and environmental and evolutionary change. In this study, timeseries analyses of high-resolution (10–20 k.y.) magnetic susceptibility data identify sixteen 405 k.y. eccentricity cycles in the magnetic susceptibility stratigraphy of the Frasnian (Late Devonian), derived from carbonate-platform and surrounding slope and basin deposits in western Alberta, Canada. Previous studies demonstrated the generally consistent pattern of magnetic susceptibility change across the Alberta basin and thus demonstrated the utility of magnetic susceptibility stratigraphy as a refi ned regional correlation tool compared to biostratigraphy. In the present study, we show that the magnetic susceptibility stratigraphy of the Frasnian interval in western Alberta has been signifi cantly infl uenced by astro nomical forcing. Using the sixteen 405 k.y. eccentricity cycles as a geochronometer, we constructed a Frasnian astronomical time scale. This time scale indicates a duration of 6.5 ± 0.4 m.y. for the Frasnian. Calibrating this duration to the best available Devonian chronology, the absolute age of the Givetian-Frasnian boundary is recalculated to 383.6 ± 3.0 Ma, and the age of the Frasnian-Famennian boundary is recalculated to 376.7 ± 3.0 Ma. These new absolute ages take into account the astronomically derived duration of the Frasnian, but they also yield a narrowing of the error margins of the absolute ages by several hundreds of thousands of years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".