MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131200591 · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2022.3218019

Dynamic Precision Analog Computing for Neural Networks

2022· article· en· W3131200591 on OpenAlexafffund
Sahaj Garg, Joe Lou, Anirudh Jain, Zhimu Guo, Bhavin J. Shastri, Mitchell A. Nahmias

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceNoise (video)Artificial neural networkAnalog computerComputer engineeringArtificial intelligenceEffective number of bitsElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analog electronic and optical computing exhibit tremendous advantages over digital computing for accelerating deep learning when operations are executed at low precision. Although digital architectures support programmable precision to increase efficiency, analog computing architectures today only support a single, static precision. In this work, we characterize the relationship between the effective number of bits (ENOB) of precision of analog processors, which is limited by noise, and digital bit precision for quantized neural networks. We propose extending analog computing architectures to support dynamic levels of precision by repeating operations and averaging the result, decreasing the impact of noise. To utilize dynamic precision, we propose a method for learning the precision of each layer of a pre-trained model without retraining network weights. We evaluate this method on analog architectures subject to shot noise, thermal noise, and weight noise and find that employing dynamic precision reduces energy consumption by up to 89% for computer vision models such as Resnet50 and by 24% for natural language processing models such as BERT. In one example, we apply dynamic precision to a shot-noise limited homodyne optical neural network and simulate inference at an optical energy consumption of 2.7 aJ/MAC for Resnet50 and 1.6 aJ/MAC for BERT with${< }2\%$accuracy degradation, implying that the optical energy consumption is unlikely to be the dominant cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum ElectronicsSame topicNeural Networks and Reservoir ComputingFrench-language works237,207