Dynamic Precision Analog Computing for Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analog electronic and optical computing exhibit tremendous advantages over digital computing for accelerating deep learning when operations are executed at low precision. Although digital architectures support programmable precision to increase efficiency, analog computing architectures today only support a single, static precision. In this work, we characterize the relationship between the effective number of bits (ENOB) of precision of analog processors, which is limited by noise, and digital bit precision for quantized neural networks. We propose extending analog computing architectures to support dynamic levels of precision by repeating operations and averaging the result, decreasing the impact of noise. To utilize dynamic precision, we propose a method for learning the precision of each layer of a pre-trained model without retraining network weights. We evaluate this method on analog architectures subject to shot noise, thermal noise, and weight noise and find that employing dynamic precision reduces energy consumption by up to 89% for computer vision models such as Resnet50 and by 24% for natural language processing models such as BERT. In one example, we apply dynamic precision to a shot-noise limited homodyne optical neural network and simulate inference at an optical energy consumption of 2.7 aJ/MAC for Resnet50 and 1.6 aJ/MAC for BERT with${< }2\%$accuracy degradation, implying that the optical energy consumption is unlikely to be the dominant cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".