Solidarités provinciales: Histoire de la Fédération des travailleurs et travailleuses du Nouveau-Brunswick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Directeurs de la collection : Alvin Finkel et Greg KealeyLe Comité canadien sur l'histoire du travail (cch t) / Canadian Committee on Labour History (ccl h) est l'organisme canadien regroupant les historiens et d'autres universitaires qui s'intéressent à l'étude de la vie des travailleurs et travailleuses et de leurs luttes tout au long de l'histoire du Canada.Depuis 1976, le cch t / ccl h publie Labour/Le Travail, la plus importante revue savante du Canada consacrée aux études ouvrières.Il publie également des livres, maintenant en collaboration avec AU Press, qui sont consacrés à l'histoire des travailleurs canadiens et de leurs organisations.Cette collection réunit principalement des documents accessibles au lectorat ouvrier et au lectorat universitaire, plutôt que simplement des études universitaires dans le domaine du travail.Elle comprend des recueils de documents, des histoires orales, des autobiographies, des biographies et des historiques de mouvements ouvriers provinciaux et locaux dans une optique populaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".