MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131207524 · doi:10.7202/1075153ar

Vivre en milieu périurbain : rapport au lieu et lien social. Le cas des Grandbasilois

2021· article· fr· W3131207524 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Carmelle Benoît

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPlace Attachment and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les changements sociaux contemporains liés à l’expansion de la banlieue et du milieu périurbain sont l’objet de préoccupations quant au rôle du rapport au lieu et de ses conséquences sur la détermination des liens sociaux et des interdépendances entre les individus. On peut se demander si, dans les circonstances, le lien social est affaibli voire menacé. Une étude de cas composée de quarante et un entretiens semi-dirigés effectués auprès de citoyens de la ville de Saint-Basile-le-Grand sur la Rive-Sud de Montréal nous sert d’outil d’analyse. En résultat, nous constatons un rapport au lieu marqué, à savoir un enracinement local et un ancrage familial soutenu qui témoigne d’un caractère familialiste et « localiste ». La sociabilité et les interrelations sociales sont notables et le rôle des enfants y est prépondérant. Le sentiment d’appartenance et l’identité sociale sont manifestes. Le portrait n'est toutefois pas unilatéral : individualité et sociabilité, engagement et distanciation, autonomie et isolement créent des tensions chez les individus et laissent poindre un rapport au lieu et des liens sociaux reconfigurés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.267
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociographiquesSame topicPlace Attachment and Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207