MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3131276360 · doi:10.1101/2021.02.11.430843

Using a Human Circulation Mathematical Model to Simulate the Effects of Hemodialysis and Therapeutic Hypothermia

2021· preprint· en· W3131276360 on OpenAlexafffund
Jermiah J. Joseph, Timothy J. Hunter, Clara Sun, Daniel Goldman, Sanjay Kharche, Christopher W. McIntyre

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsLawson Health Research InstituteCompute CanadaCanarieHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsHemodialysisHypothermiaMedicineDialysisBlood pressurePopulationCardiologyHeart rateAtrial fibrillationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The human blood circulation is an intricate process regulated by multiple biophysical factors. Our patients often suffer from renal disease and atrial fibrillation, and are given treatments such as therapeutic hypothermia, exercise, and hemodialysis. In this work, a hemodynamic mathematical model of human circulation coupled to a representative dialysis machine is developed and used to explore causal mechanisms of our recent clinical observations. Methods An ordinary differential equation model consisting of human whole body circulation, baroreflex control, and a hemodialysis machine was implemented. Experimentally informed parameter alterations were used to implement hemodialysis and therapeutic hypothermia. By means of parameter perturbation, four model populations encompassing baseline, dialysed, hypothermia treated, and simultaneous dialysed with hypothermia were generated. In model populations, multiple conditions including atrial fibrillation, exercise, and renal failure were simulated. The effects of all conditions on clinically relevant non-invasive measurables such as heart rate and blood pressure were quantified. A parameter sensitivity analysis was implemented to rank model output influencing parameters in the presented model. Results Results were interpreted as alterations of the respective populations mean values and standard deviations of the clinical measurables, both in relation to the baseline population. A clinical measurable’s smaller standard deviation (in comparison to baseline population) was interpreted as a stronger association between a given clinical measure and the corresponding underlying process, which may permit the use of deducing one by observation of the other. The modelled dialysis was observed to increase systolic blood pressure, vessel shear, and heart rate. Therapeutic hypothermia was observed to reduce blood pressure as well as the intra-population standard deviation (heterogeneity) of blood flow in the large (aorta) and small (kidney) vasculature. Therapeutic hypothermia reduced shear in vessels, suggesting a potential benefit with respect to endothelial dysfunction and maintenance of microcirculatory blood flow. The action of therapeutic hypothermia under conditions such as atrial fibrillation, exercise, and renal failure was to reduce total blood flow, which was applicable in all simulated populations. Therapeutic hypothermia did not affect the dialysis function, but exercise improved the efficacy of dialysis by facilitating water removal. Conclusions This study illuminates some mechanisms of action for therapeutic hypothermia. It also suggests clinical measurables that may be used as surrogates to diagnose underlying diseases such as atrial fibrillation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→