Rapid evolution of complete dosage compensation in <i>Poecilia</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Dosage compensation balances gene expression between the sexes in systems with diverged heterogametic sex chromosomes. Theory predicts that dosage compensation should rapidly evolve in parallel with the divergence of sex chromosomes to prevent the deleterious effects of dosage imbalances that occur as a result of sex chromosome divergence. Examples of complete dosage compensation, where gene expression of the entire sex chromosome is compensated, are rare and have only been found in relatively ancient sex chromosome systems. Consequently, very little is known about the evolutionary dynamics of complete dosage compensation systems. We recently found the first example of complete dosage compensation in a fish, Poecilia picta . We also found that the Y chromosome degraded substantially in the common ancestor of P. picta and their close relative Poecilia parae . In this study we find that P. parae also have complete dosage compensation, thus complete dosage compensation likely evolved in the short (∼3.7 my) interval after the split of the ancestor of these two species from P. reticulata , but before they diverged from each other. These data suggest that novel dosage compensation mechanisms can evolve rapidly, thus supporting the longstanding theoretical prediction that such mechanisms arise in parallel with rapidly diverging sex chromosomes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In species with XY sex chromosomes, females (XX) have as many copies of X-linked genes compared to males (XY), leading to unbalanced expression between the sexes. Theory predicts that dosage compensation mechanisms should evolve rapidly as X and Y chromosomes diverge, but examples of complete dosage compensation in recently diverged sex chromosomes are scarce, making this theory difficult to test. Across Poeciliid species the X and Y chromosomes have recently diversified. Here we find complete dosage compensation evolved rapidly as the X and Y diverged in the common ancestor of Poecilia parae and P. picta , supporting that novel dosage compensation mechanisms can evolve rapidly in tandem with diverging sex chromosomes. These data confirm longstanding theoretical predictions of sex chromosome evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".