Edge Intelligence (EI)-Enabled HTTP Anomaly Detection Framework for the Internet of Things (IoT)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, with the rapid development of the Internet of Things (IoT), various applications based on IoT have become more and more popular in industrial and living sectors. However, the hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) as a popular application protocol used in various IoT applications faces a variety of security vulnerabilities. This article proposes a novel HTTP anomaly detection framework based on edge intelligence (EI) for IoT. In this framework, both clustering and classification methods are used to quickly and accurately detect anomalies in the HTTP traffic for IoT. Unlike the existing works relying on a centralized server to perform anomaly detection, with the recent advances in EI, the proposed framework distributes the entire detection process to different nodes. Moreover, a data processing method is proposed to divide the detection fields of HTTP data, which can eliminate redundant data and extract features from the fields of an HTTP header. Simulation results show that the proposed framework can significantly improve the speed and accuracy of HTTP anomaly detection, especially for unknown anomalies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it