MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131588002 · doi:10.1080/08120099.2021.1876165

Preservation of the Cadia Valley porphyry Au–Cu district, NSW, Australia: Silurian basin formation and subsequent inversion

2021· article· en· W3131588002 on OpenAlexaff
Malissa Groome, Richard M. Tosdal, Anthony C. Harris, Ian G. Percival

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOrdovicianGeochemistryPaleontologyOrogenyMagmatismUnconformityBasementStructural basinTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preservation of pre-Cenozoic porphyry Cu deposits requires geological events that bury the deposits before significant exhumation. Burial may be due to basin development over the top of the porphyry system or to burial beneath thrust sheets. The porphyry Au–Cu deposits in the Cadia district of central New South Wales underwent both events, and thus this metal-rich part of the crust survived the overprinted tectonic events that shaped eastern Australia. The Cadia porphyry Au–Cu deposits are associated with the Upper Ordovician to lower Silurian Cadia Intrusive Complex emplaced into the Upper Ordovician to lower Silurian Forest Reefs Volcanics and Middle Ordovician Weemalla Formation during the final phase of Macquarie Arc magmatism. Published stratigraphic evidence suggests west-northwest-striking faults influenced stratigraphic facies and thicknesses in the Forest Reefs Volcanics. Generally north- to east-northeast-striking faults that developed early in the district’s history are likely a product of exhumation of the porphyry Au–Cu deposits and their host rocks during and after the Benambran Orogeny. Alteration halos of several of the porphyry Au–Cu and skarns were exhumed at this time. Later during the Silurian (Wenlock to early Ludlow), the partially exhumed porphyry systems were buried beneath sediments, correlated with the Waugoola and Mumbil groups, in a rift–sag basinal sequence deposited initially in local fault-bounded basins that must be connected regionally to formation of the Cowra and Hill End troughs to the west and east, respectively. This basin geometry was controlled by the reactivation of the extant basement faults. Shortening of the Silurian sedimentary succession during younger Paleozoic orogenies was accommodated in thin-skinned fold and thrust faults forming a complex network of bedding-parallel detachments, ramps and anticlines that are linked to steeply dipping reverse and oblique-reverse slip faults in the underlying Forest Reefs Volcanics and the Cadia Intrusive Complex.KEY POINTSThe world-class porphyry Au–Ci deposits were initially exhumed for a relatively brief interval during the early Silurian as a result of the Benambran Orogeny.The porphyry Au–Cu deposits were subsequently buried beneath Silurian sediments of the Waugoola Group accumulating in rifted basins formed during the Wenlock and Ludlow epochs of the Silurian, with sedimentary deposition continuing into the Pridoli (latest Silurian) in the lower part of the Mumbil Group.The Silurian basin was inverted with thin-skinned fabrics in the Silurian sedimentary rocks and thick-skin fabric localised along pre-existing faults, burying the deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207