Driving Mode Predictor-Based Real-Time Energy Management for Dual-Source Electric Vehicle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To minimize battery aging of electric vehicles (EVs), it is paramount to manage efficiently their energy consumption. An energy management strategy (EMS) has recently been developed, where batteries and supercapacitors (SCs) are coordinated as a function of the driving mode which is determined manually by the driver. In the present article, we improve the EMS by developing a driving mode predictor (DMP) that determines automatically in real-time the driving mode simply from the speed history of the vehicle. The DMP is designed using supervised learning (SL), a branch of machine learning (ML). A strength of our approach is that it is applicable to predict the driving modes of any EV. To predict the driving modes during a trip made by a given EV, the DMP needs to follow the speed evolution of the EV and know its maximum reachable speed. The integration of the DMP into the EMS results in an enhanced EMS called DMP-based EMS that determines automatically in real-time the power to take from each source of energy of the EV as a function of its speed history. The results obtained from real driving cycles confirm the prediction quality of the DMP and the energy efficiency of the proposed DMP-based EMS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".