MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131614982 · doi:10.1109/tte.2021.3059545

Driving Mode Predictor-Based Real-Time Energy Management for Dual-Source Electric Vehicle

2021· article· en· W3131614982 on OpenAlexafffund
Marouane Adnane, Bảo‐Huy Nguyễn, Ahmed Khoumsi, João Pedro F. Trovão

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMode (computer interface)Automotive engineeringBattery (electricity)SupercapacitorComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Dual (grammatical number)Electric vehicleFunction (biology)Energy managementPower (physics)SimulationDual modeReal-time computingEngineeringElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To minimize battery aging of electric vehicles (EVs), it is paramount to manage efficiently their energy consumption. An energy management strategy (EMS) has recently been developed, where batteries and supercapacitors (SCs) are coordinated as a function of the driving mode which is determined manually by the driver. In the present article, we improve the EMS by developing a driving mode predictor (DMP) that determines automatically in real-time the driving mode simply from the speed history of the vehicle. The DMP is designed using supervised learning (SL), a branch of machine learning (ML). A strength of our approach is that it is applicable to predict the driving modes of any EV. To predict the driving modes during a trip made by a given EV, the DMP needs to follow the speed evolution of the EV and know its maximum reachable speed. The integration of the DMP into the EMS results in an enhanced EMS called DMP-based EMS that determines automatically in real-time the power to take from each source of energy of the EV as a function of its speed history. The results obtained from real driving cycles confirm the prediction quality of the DMP and the energy efficiency of the proposed DMP-based EMS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Transportation ElectrificationSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207