Rien ne nous émeut moins que ce qui nous émouvait hier : un commentaire linéaire de la préface auctoriale de la première édition allemande du Capital (1867)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La préface auctoriale de la première édition allemande du Capital nous renseigne aujourd’hui sur les desseins de son auteur — Marx —, en plus de nous fournir de précieuses indications sur la manière dont ce dernier espérait être compris de ses lecteurs. Cette préface suggère une lecture du Capital qui n’est pas du tout celle que suggère la postface de la seconde édition de l’ouvrage, à laquelle la tradition commentatoriale s’est surtout intéressée jusqu’ici. Et pour cause : ces deux productions paratextuelles (Genette) assurent des fonctions littéraires différentes. Le commentaire linéaire que l’on s’apprête à lire porte sur les fonctions de la préface auctoriale de la première édition allemande du Capital, et sur la lecture qu’elle suggère de cet ouvrage, c’est-à-dire une lecture éthique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".