Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les rencontres faites avec les personnes transidentitaires ont provoqué un véritable renversement pratique et théorique. Ces renversements ont dépassé la question transidentitaire pour penser autrement l’abord psychanalytique des problématiques humaines et aboutir à la construction d’une psychanalyse nouvelle, la psychanalyse sociale. Cette dernière se distingue de la psychanalyse classique en partant d’une autre base : la base de la vie sociale qui est transférentielle. Dans ce contexte de vie sociale transférentielle, la référence à l’œuvre de Marx est utilisée et permet une analyse des expériences de vies transidentitaires à partir des concepts de transfert social et de transfert de valeurs. La logique de la dynamique transidentitaire est centrée sur la valeur de genre qui fait vivre et la reconnaissance par les autres de cette valeur. Le nouage entre les éléments fondamentaux de l’identité, « mot-image-corps », et la privation, pris dans la vie sociale transférentielle donne les repères logiques permettant une intelligibilité des problématiques. Un exemple concret est analysé à travers le commentaire d’un film vietnamien portant sur la transidentité Finding Phong .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.973 | 0.975 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".