The effect of financial policy and capital assets on firm performance: Evidence from service companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to demonstrate the impact of the financial policy, represented in debt policy and dividend policy, and the capital assets on the financial performance measured by return on equity, total assets turnover and market value added of 53 service companies listed on the Amman stock exchange during the period 2014–2018, using the panel data models. According to the results of testing performed on return on equities (ROE) model, total assets turnover (TAT) model, and market value added (MVA) model, it can be concluded that debt policy has a negative significant effect on market value added and total assets turnover, on the other hand, it has a negative insignificant effect on return on equity. The financial performance of the Jordanian service companies is influenced negatively by the debt ratio as a measure of financial policy; which means service companies are using heavy debt to finance the operating activities, which increases financial cost and the risk of financial failure. The study recommended that service companies can increase the volume of investment in fixed assets to generate high financial performance indicators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".