MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131757385 · doi:10.1093/ehr/ceab021

Teaching Britain: Elementary Teachers and the State of the Everyday, 1846–1906, by Christopher Bischof

2021· article· en· W3131757385 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Heathorn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe English Historical Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Education Studies and Reforms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsState (computer science)SociologyPsychologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a series of eight, brisk chapters studded with telling examples, Christopher Bischof takes the reader through the process of becoming an elementary schoolteacher in Victorian England and Scotland, from their experiences as pupil teachers, though training college, onto the job market and into assistant teaching positions, and towards the dream of landing an elusive head teacher placement. The book examines teachers’ ‘everyday’ school experience, their self-fashioning of professional and social status in often financially straitened circumstances, their holiday travel, the gulf between rural and urban teaching situations, and their interventions into political debates about education. The view presented is a much more generous and optimistic view of elementary teachers than scholars of Victorian culture are typically used to; it is very much a view of teachers of which they themselves would have approved. Bischof’s teachers thumb their noses at their superiors and flout the rules in training college; they...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe English Historical ReviewSame topicDiverse Education Studies and ReformsFrench-language works237,207