MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3131996054 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3758532

The Euclid Mission

2019· article· en· W3131996054 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Architectural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityDalhousie UniversityMcMaster UniversityPerimeter InstituteHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingComputer scienceGeologyAstrobiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Euclid is an ESA-led medium class space mission selected in October 2011, with launch planned for 2022. The Euclid mission aims at understanding why the expansion of the Universe is accelerating and what is the nature of the source - commonly called dark energy - responsible for this acceleration. Dark energy represents around 75% of the energy content of the Universe today, and together with dark matter it dominates the Universe's matter-energy content. Understanding dark energy is one of the key goals of physics over the next decade. The imprints of dark energy and gravity will be tracked by Euclid using two complementary cosmological probes to capture signatures of the expansion rate of the Universe and the growth of cosmic structures: weak gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering (both through baryonic acoustic oscillations and redshift-space distortions).<br> <br> Although low-redshift cosmology is the primary driver of the mission, a wide range of science will be possible with the Euclid data. The Euclid Mission aims to survey over 15,000 deg^2 of the extragalactic sky with imaging in a wide visible (riz) band at 0.1" resolution, near-infrared photometry (Y, J, and H) and near-infrared spectroscopy. As a result, the Euclid Mission will generate a vast data set for legacy science, including broadband visible images and near-infrared photometry of roughly 1.5 billion galaxies and near-infrared spectroscopy of roughly 25 million galaxies. Such a large data set will touch on many aspects of astrophysics, on many different scales, from the formation and evolution of galaxies down to the detection of brown dwarfs.<br> <br> In 2016, Canada joined the Euclid Consortium when CFHT approved the Canada-France Imaging Survey (CFIS) as a Large Program. CFIS, along with other ground-based surveys, will be used by Euclid to measure photometric redshifts in the northern sky. 27 faculty-level astronomers in Canada are members of the Euclid Consortium. In this white paper, we present a status update for Euclid, and a request that the committee make a strong recommendation that funds be allocated to support the exploitation of the Euclid data by Canadian researchers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical and Architectural StudiesFrench-language works237,207