Detecting subject-specific fatigue-related changes in lifting kinematics using a machine learning approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individual responses to fatigue have been observed in lifting kinematics, suggesting a subjectspecific approach is necessary for fatigue identification. One-class support vector machines (OCSVM) may provide an objective method to classify fatigue-related kinematic changes during repetitive lifting. Participants completed a repetitive lifting protocol while motion capture recorded lifting motions. Subject-specific kinematics from participants' first 35% of lifts trained OCSVM decision boundaries. The remaining lifts were separated into test sets and classified against the decision boundary to identify the percentage of outlier lifts within each test set. Spearman's correlation assessed if the test sets' percentage of outlier lifts increased concurrently with participants' rating of perceived exertion (RPE). Significant positive associations were found for participants who demonstrated evidence of fatigue, while no significant associations were found for participants who did not demonstrate evidence of fatigue. These results demonstrate the prospective efficacy of an outlier detection tool for fatigue detection during repetitive lifting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".