MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3132110757 · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00025-x

Evaluating neonatal medical devices in Africa

2021· article· en· W3132110757 on OpenAlexaff
Amy Sarah Ginsburg, William Macharia, J. Mark Ansermino

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Digital Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsMedicinePsychological interventionChild mortalityNeonatal mortalityInfant mortalityMortality rateMalariaDemographyEnvironmental healthPediatricsPopulationNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globally, 47% of deaths of children younger than 5 years occur within the first 28 days of life, with sub-Saharan Africa bearing the greatest burden with the average neonatal mortality rate being 28 deaths per 1000 livebirths.1 Neonatal death can be prevented by achieving high coverage of high-quality, evidence-based, and timely interventions. To meet the Sustainable Development Goal target of reducing global neonatal mortality to 12 deaths per 1000 livebirths by 2030, accelerated improvements and innovations in neonatal care in Africa, particularly technologies that allow for early detection and intervention for major morbidities, are needed to reduce current and projected neonatal mortality rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.093
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.093
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Digital HealthSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207