MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3132131613 · doi:10.5585/ijsm.v16i4.2512

How can a live fish live out of Brazil? The case of peixonauta

2017· article· en· W3132131613 on OpenAlexaff
Wilian Gatti, Márcio Luiz Marietto

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperationalizationInternationalizationConceptualizationCommercializationAnimationProduct (mathematics)BusinessMarketingComputer scienceInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes to demonstrate, through a case study, how a small Brazilian company of animation industry operationalized the national and international production and commercialization, exporting to more than 60 countries, your product: the Peixonauta series. The Brazil, historically a consumer of these products, has not developed its animation industry. The TV Pinguim operationalized an alternative to this situation showing that it is possible to produce locally animation with international quality. The research has shown that the organization based their strategic competences in the conduct of the project considering the maintenance of focus on the creation activity and, mainly, on the capacity to identify, uses and influence governmental and market factors, embedded in its contextual environment of reference. For that, we present the concepts of Institutional Pillars and Internationalization, because we consider that the understanding of these concepts provides a solid basis for managers of small companies that intend to internationalize their products. We also understand that the theoretical conceptualization and the case contribute to the managers of small companies to increase their perception of institutional and governmental opportunities that their businesses are embedded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Ibero-Americana de EstratégiaSame topicCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207