MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3132201872

Building the Alaska pipeline : story of a legend : Frank Moolin

2009· article· en· W3132201872 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian Weinstein

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline (software)Port (circuit theory)EngineeringBayWork (physics)ArchaeologyCivil engineeringEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article chronicled the events that took place during the building of the Alaska Pipeline from Prudhoe Bay on Alaska's Northern Coast to the Port of Valdez. In particular, it highlighted the project management led by senior project manager Frank Moolin. The oil companies officially announced their plans to begin the pipeline in February 1969. The estimated cost was $900 million, and completion was targeted for 1972. Moolin was hired by Alyeska, the company formed to design and build the pipeline. The Alaska Pipeline project was launched with little more than a goal and no clear roadmap for achieving it. Project critics claimed that it was impossible to build an 800-mile pipeline through the Alaskan wilderness using conventional methods. In addition to facing obstacles, contingency scenarios, and timetable problems, the oil companies were stopped by environmental groups and Native Alaskans who had no intention of allowing the pipeline to be built on their land. In response, oil companies wanted to lay the pipeline underground, but geologists pointed out that a large portion of Alaska rests on permafrost that cannot support any weight when it thaws. Geological testing revealed that nearly 400 miles of the pipeline had to be built above ground. In January 1974, Frank Moolin's construction crew of 20,000 people began the preparatory work. First, a supply road was built through the northern half of Alaska, from the Yukon River north of Fairbanks to Prudhoe Bay. By March 1975, three million tons of pipe, machinery, spare parts, fuel and food were hauled in, and the pipe-laying began. Moolin motivated his workers and kept morale high throughout the difficult building process. For two years, Moolin kept the problem-ridden project on track. Twelve pump stations had to be built so that 800 miles of pipe could be welded together 40 feet at a time. On June 20, 1977, the valves at Prudhoe Bay were opened, and the first Alaskan crude oil began to flow. The final tab on the Alaska Pipeline project was $8 billion, 10 times the original estimate. 1 fig.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0220.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Same topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207