MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3132390750 · doi:10.1029/2020jc016639

Vorticity Recirculation and Asymmetric Generation at a Small Headland With Broadband Currents

2021· article· en· W3132390750 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michael Kovatch, Falk Feddersen, D. J. Grimes, Jamie MacMahan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsVorticityHeadlandGeologyVorticity equationEmpirical orthogonal functionsPotential vorticityGeodesyVortexPhysicsClimatologyMeteorologyOceanographyShore

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fixed acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) velocity measurements are used to investigate headland vorticity generation and recirculation in ∼20 m depth around the small (∼1 km) central California headland Pt. Sal. To reduce vorticity estimation noise, velocities are reconstructed from the first two Empirical Orthogonal Function modes representing ≈73% of the variance. Using fixed ADCPs, depth‐averaged vorticity is estimated west and south of Pt. Sal. Only one west‐location vorticity component is estimated, leading to negative vorticity bias for northward flow. The south location vorticity is consistent with estimates from parallel vessel transects on one day. The observed depth‐averaged flow V was primarily along‐bathymetric contours and varied ±0.2 ms−1 across subtidal and tidal frequency bands. The depth‐averaged normalized vorticity varied ±8 across all frequency bands. Vorticity distributions are skewed with opposite sign at west and south locations, and is more likely at the west location. At both locations, depth‐averaged vorticity and velocity are inversely related, with relationship asymmetric with sign of V, indicating headland and farther upstream vorticity generation. Binned‐mean depends on both V and its time‐derivative, and indicates vorticity recirculation across the headland. The ∼2 h vorticity adjustment timescale and the associated short excursion distances indicate vorticity generation between south and west locations. Potential vorticity changes across the headland are different for positive and negative V indicating headland asymmetric vorticity generation. Pt. Sal occupies a nondimensional parameter space that is unique relative to other well studied headlands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207