MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3132391918 · doi:10.1109/tcns.2021.3124259

Optimal Control of Network-Coupled Subsystems: Spectral Decomposition and Low-Dimensional Solutions

2021· preprint· en· W3132391918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdjacency matrixLaplacian matrixEigenvalues and eigenvectorsMatrix (chemical analysis)Spectral graph theoryMatrix decompositionSymmetric matrixMathematicsCoupling (piping)Degeneracy (biology)Eigendecomposition of a matrixGraph theoryTopology (electrical circuits)GraphComputer scienceApplied mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsPhysicsVoltage graph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we investigate the optimal control of network-coupled subsystems with coupled dynamics and costs. The dynamics coupling may be represented by the adjacency matrix, the Laplacian matrix, or any other symmetric matrix corresponding to an underlying weighted undirected graph. Cost couplings are represented by two coupling matrices which have the same eigenvectors as the coupling matrix in the dynamics. We use the spectral decomposition of these three coupling matrices to decompose the overall system into <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$({L+1})$</tex-math></inline-formula> systems with decoupled dynamics and cost, where <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$L$</tex-math></inline-formula> is the number of linearly independent eigendirections associated with nonzero eigenvalue triples of the three coupling matrices. Furthermore, the optimal control input at each subsystem can be computed by solving <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$({L_\text{dist}+1})$</tex-math></inline-formula> decoupled Riccati equations, where <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$L_\text{dist}\,(L_\text{dist}\leq L)$</tex-math></inline-formula> is the number of distinct nonzero eigenvalue triples of the three coupling matrices. A salient feature of the result is that, given the spectral decompositions of the couplings, the solution complexity does not directly depend on the number of subsystems. Therefore, the proposed solution framework provides a scalable method for synthesizing and implementing optimal control laws for large-scale network-coupled subsystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it