Biresponses Kernel Nonparametric Regression: Inflation and Economic Growth
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relation between inflation and economic growth is interesting to observe. To maintain the inflation rate, two factors should be taken into account, namely keeping the economic pulse at its optimal rate and keeping people's purchasing power from decreasing. Many factors influence the inflation and economic growth of a nation; one of which is the national bank interest rate. Since the data of inflation are closely related to economic growth, this study aims at modelling the data of inflation rate and economic growth of Central Java Province in Indonesia using bi-response kernel regression. Employing the data from the first trimester of 2007 up to those from the second trimester of 2019 which were processed using kernel Gauss, the best model to minimise the value of GCV was obtained with optimum h for inflation model amounting to 0.12 and 81.75 for economic growth model. The model performance was excellent because the MAPE out sample was less than 10%. The biresponses kernel model is better than the linear biresponses model in terms of GCV, MSE, R2, and MAPE values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it