MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ciclo 0-4: Concepção, criação, divulgação e consolidação (ou da Thésis à antithesis)

2017· article· pt· W3132525820 on OpenAlexaff
Luiz Amorim, Márcio Cotrim, Rachel Coutinho, Xico Costa

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Thésis · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Education Research
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sem que houvesse consciência, o título do editorial da edição número 1 faz referência a ideia de ciclo – Da hipothésis à Thésis, ou seja, da concepção sobre como deveria e qual o papel do periódico de uma associação como a ANPARQ até a Thésis 4 que, orgulhosamente, entregamos agora aos leitores. Os quatro números são resultado de um profícuo processo de criação, divulgação e consolidação. Este é o último número sob nossa batuta. Trata-se, portanto, do encerramento de uma etapa inicial, que pretendeu ser coletivo em todos as instâncias da Associação e atender à diversidade e especificidade da nossa área.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0120.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista ThésisSame topicLinguistics and Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207