Quantitative phase field simulations of polycrystalline solidification using a vector order parameter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A vector order parameter phase field model derived from a grand potential functional is presented as an alternative approach for modeling polycrystalline solidification of alloys. In this approach, the grand potential density is designed to contain a discrete set of finite wells, a feature that naturally allows for the growth and controlled interaction of multiple grains using a single vector field. We verify that dendritic solidification in binary alloys follows the well-established quantitative behavior in the thin interface limit. In addition, it is shown that grain boundary energy and solute back-diffusion are quantitatively consistent with earlier theoretical work, with grain boundary energy being controlled through a simple solid-solid interaction parameter. Moreover, when considering polycrystalline aggregates and their coarsening, we show that the kinetics follow the expected parabolic growth law. Finally, we demonstrate how this vector order parameter model can be used to describe nucleation in polycrystalline systems via thermal fluctuations of the vector order parameter, a process that cannot be treated consistently with multiphase or multi-order-parameter based phase field models. The presented vector order parameter model serves as a practical and efficient computational tool for simulating polycrystalline materials. We also discuss the extension of the order parameter to higher dimensions as a simple method for modeling multiple solid phases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".