MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3132847453 · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21566-w

Author Correction: Risk variants and polygenic architecture of disruptive behavior disorders in the context of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

2021· erratum· en· W3132847453 on OpenAlexaff
Ditte Demontis, Raymond K. Walters, Veera M. Rajagopal, Irwin D. Waldman, Jakob Grove, Thomas D. Als, Søren Dalsgaard, Marta Ribasés, Jonas Bybjerg‐Grauholm, Maria Bækvad-Hansen, Thomas Werge, Merete Nordentoft, Ole Mors, Preben Bo Mortensen, Ole A. Andreassen, María J. Arranz, Tobias Banaschewski, Claiton H.D. Bau, Mark A. Bellgrove, Joseph Biederman, Isabell Brikell, Jan K. Buitelaar, Christie L. Burton, Miguel Casas, Jennifer Crosbie, Alysa E. Doyle, Richard P. Ebstein, Josephine Elia, Elizabeth C. Corfield, Eugênio H. Grevet, Natalie Grizenko, Alexandra Havdahl, Ziarih Hawi, Johannes Hebebrand, Amaia Hervás, Sarah Hohmann, Jan Haavik, Ridha Joober, Lindsey Kent, Jonna Kuntsi, K. Langley, Henrik Larsson, Klaus‐Peter Lesch, Patrick W. L. Leung, Calwing Liao, Sandra K. Loo, Joanna Martin, Nicholas G. Martin, Sarah E. Medland, Ana Miranda, Nina Roth Mota, Robert D. Oades, Josep Antoni Ramos‐Quiroga, Andreas Reif, Marcella Rietschel, Herbert Roeyers, Luís Augusto Rohde, Aribert Rothenberger, Paula Rovira, Cristina Sánchez‐Mora, Russell Schachar, Sarojini M. Sengupta, María Soler Artigas, Hans‐Christoph Steinhausen, Anita Thapar, Stephanie H. Witt, Li Yang, Tetyana Zayats, Yanli Zhang‐James, Bru Cormand, David M. Hougaard, Benjamin M. Neale, Barbara Franke, Stephen V. Faraone, Anders D. Børglum

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2021
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersLundbeckfonden
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Polygenic risk scoreGenetic architectureAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderAttention deficitComputer sciencePsychologyMedicineComputational biologyPsychiatryBiologyGeneticsQuantitative trait locusGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21566-w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.067
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.067
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0060.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0940.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Communications→Same topicAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder→French-language works237,207→