MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O IMPACTO ECONÔMICO NAS MICROEMPRESAS BRASILEIRAS DURANTE A CRISE DA COVID-19 E AS MEDIDAS ADOTADAS POR PARTE DO GOVERNO FEDERAL NO MERCADO DE TRABALHO

2021· article· en· W3132879569 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel da Silva Mendes, Jose P. Zampieri Filho, Josney Freitas Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista AKEDIA Versões Negligências e Outros Mundos · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic Research in Diverse Fields
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Christian ministryWelfare economicsContext (archaeology)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PopulationHumanitiesEconomic stabilityBusinessPolitical scienceEconomyGeographyEconomicsSociologyMedicineDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to address the economic impact during the health and economic crisis of COVID-19, in the Brazilian micro-enterprises raised by SEBRAE, as well as to understand what measures were adopted by the Federal Government and the Ministry of Economy to reduce this shock, in the context of the labor market. Methodologically, we use the inductive method, using the procedure of presenting some data capable of sampling the dimension of the current situation, combined with a quantitative research applied by SEBRAE / FGV, a study in which the consequences of COVID-19 for the operation of micro-enterprises. As part of the results of our investigation, we see that the aggravation of the current situation would be more easily overcome, if the majority of the population were engaged in formal jobs and had a financial stability different from the reality that the country is experiencing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista AKEDIA Versões Negligências e Outros MundosSame topicAcademic Research in Diverse FieldsFrench-language works237,207