MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3132977164 · doi:10.14785/lymphosign-2021-0012

Homozygous NF-kB1 mutation causing combined immunodeficiency: a histopathological analysis

2021· article· en· W3132977164 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jenny Garkaby, Bo Ngan

Bibliographic record

VenueLymphoSign Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminal centerHistopathologyImmunodeficiencyLymph nodePathologyImmune systemBiologyContext (archaeology)B cellLymph node biopsyImmunologyCancer researchMedicineAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) signaling pathway plays a major role in mediating multiple cellular processes, including immune and inflammatory responses. Aims: We describe the histopathological findings of lymph nodes from a patient with a homozygous NF-kB subunit 1 (NF-kB1) mutation causing a combined immunodeficiency phenotype. Results: A nodal biopsy was performed for lymphadenopathy evaluation, in the context of development of persistent EBV infection. Our findings show that this patient has normal lymph node tissue present, however, abnormal histopathology features were observed, including atrophic germinal centers. B cell subset components within the B cell domain were also analyzed. The development of the B cell response during EBV infection was found to be significantly impaired. Conclusion: Aberrant signaling due to NF-kB1 deficiency has a significant impact on the development of B cell immunoproliferative responses. Statement of novelty: We report on the abnormal histopathology findings of lymph node biopsy from a patient with homozygous NF-kB1 mutation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLymphoSign JournalSame topicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune DisordersFrench-language works237,207