Family Leucospidae Walker, 1834.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<title>Abstract</title> This chapter provides a checklist for the family Leucospidae. It provides information on species diversity, host records, distribution records by province in Iran, as well as world distribution. Comparison of the leucospid fauna of Iran (six species) with adjacent countries shows that it has the same number of species as Turkey, followed by Russia (five species), United Arab Emirates (four species), Afghanistan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan (each with three species), Armenia, Azerbaijan and Pakistan (each with two species) and Saudi Arabia (one species); no species have been recorded from Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman or Qatar. Furthermore, six species were recorded from the former USSR and if the exact localities of these species were known then the number of species from Russia and Middle Asian countries adjacent to Iran would be increased. All the species recorded from Iran are shared with Turkey, whereas five species are shared with Russia, three species with Afghanistan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, and two species with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Pakistan. Four species are recorded from United Arab Emirates, none of which are yet known from Iran, but <italic>Leucospis elegans</italic> and <italic>L. vanharteni</italic> might be expected in southern Iran.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".