On the rotational–translational equilibrium in non-thermal argon plasmas at atmospheric pressure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work examines the rotational–translational equilibrium in non-thermal, argon-based plasmas at atmospheric pressure. In particular, rotational temperatures ( T rot ) and neutral gas temperatures ( T g ) are compared along the axis of plasma columns sustained by either radiofrequency (RF) or microwave (MW) electromagnetic fields. Water vapours or N 2 admixtures are added to the high-purity argon plasmas to record the rotational temperatures from the emission spectra of either the OH(A 2 Σ + − X 2 Π i ) or the N 2 + (B 2 Σ u + − X 2 Σ g + ) rovibrational systems. T g values are also deduced from the line broadening of selected Ar emission lines using an hyperfine spectrometer. In the MW Ar/H 2 O plasma, T g decreases from ∼2100 K close to the wave launcher to ∼1600 K near the end of the plasma column, while T rot is mostly constant in the 1500 K range. In presence of N 2 admixtures instead of water vapours, T g is higher by about 300 K (from ∼2400 K to ∼1900 K), while T rot decreases from ∼3200 K to ∼2750 K along the plasma column. A discrepancy between T g and T rot is also observed in the much colder RF plasmas with T g ∼ 400 K and T rot ∼ 515 K. Such departure from the rotational–translational equilibrium in both plasmas is ascribed to the influence of electrons competing with neutrals to impose their own temperature on the distribution of rotational levels of both ground and excited states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it