MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simple Dipole Scatter for Filling a Shadow Region

2020· article· en· W3133202092 on OpenAlexaff
Roshanak Zabihi, Christopher G. Hynes, Rodney G. Vaughan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShadow (psychology)DiffractionPolarization (electrochemistry)DipoleScatteringShadow mappingOpticsWavelengthSimple (philosophy)TransmitterLine-of-sightSIGNAL (programming language)Computer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For ever-increasing demand for communication capacity, carrier frequencies are increasing, but this brings greater shadowing which compromises the radio coverage. For example, mmWave signals are severely attenuated in the simplest of non-line-of-sight scenarios - around the corner of a building. We present a simple corner modification comprising a fixed scattering dipole to improve the coverage in the shadow region of the corner diffraction. Simulations are used to thoroughly investigate the scenario, and our numerical experiments are validated with physical experiments. For the vertical polarization, a signal level increase of well over ten dB in the shadow region is demonstrated using a single half-wavelength dipole scatterer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207