MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133216609 · doi:10.1109/tim.2021.3060598

Kalman Filter-Based Convolutional Neural Network for Robust Tracking of Froth-Middling Interface in a Primary Separation Vessel in Presence of Occlusions

2021· article· en· W3133216609 on OpenAlexaff
F. Amjad, Santhosh Kumar Varanasi, Biao Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Enhancement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceInterface (matter)Kalman filterArtificial intelligenceGravity separationComputer visionProcess (computing)Artificial neural networkFilter (signal processing)Pattern recognition (psychology)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bitumen in the oil sands industry is separated from sand using a water-based gravity separation process in a primary separation vessel (PSV). The interface between the froth and the middlings layer is an important parameter to control for optimal operation of the PSV unit. In this paper, a method using computer vision based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Kalman filter (KF) is designed for the detection of the interface in PSV, with the CNN estimating both the interface level and the image quality. The proposed method consists of two parts: an offline and an online stage, wherein the parameters of CNN and KF are trained in the offline stage using the available data. The algorithm is made robust to any new type of occlusions, not present in the training dataset, in the online stage. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is accurate and robust to different abnormalities in the process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicImage Enhancement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207