MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Throughput Maximization via Joint Optimization of Fronthaul and Access Links in C- RANs

2020· article· en· W3133256763 on OpenAlexaff
Javane Rostampoor, Raviraj Adve

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOrthogonal frequency-division multiple accessComputer networkOptimization problemThroughputTelecommunications linkRadio access networkAccess networkConvex optimizationC-RANResource allocationBandwidth (computing)Interference (communication)Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexingWirelessTelecommunicationsAlgorithmRegular polygonBase stationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the problem of sub-carrier and user association in a downlink cloud based radio access network (C- RAN), considering fronthaul and access radio frequency (RF) links and orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA). Our problem is most relevant to scenarios where bandwidth resources must be shared between the fronthaul and access links. In order to assign users to their appropriate cells and to allocate frequency resources, we maximize the sum throughput. Importantly, we consider fronthaul and inter-cell interference. The resulting optimization problem is based on joint fronthaul and access frequency resource allocation and user association and is non-convex. To tackle the non-convexity of the problem, a successive convex approximation method is proposed. In order to guarantee integer solutions, we introduce a term, called virtual interference, into the problem formulation. Numerical results validate the effectiveness of proposed algorithm in jointly allocating resources of fronthaul and access links. The results confirm improved total network throughput by considering full interference scheme and sharing resources between fronthaul and access links.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207