MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133277069 · doi:10.3390/agronomy11020384

Evaluation of Autosteer in Rough Terrain at Low Ground Speed for Commercial Wild Blueberry Harvesting

2021· article· en· W3133277069 on OpenAlexaff
Travis J. Esau, Craig B. MacEachern, Aitazaz A. Farooque, Qamar U. Zaman

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBerry genetics and cultivation research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsSIGNAL (programming language)TerrainOperator (biology)Remote sensingComputer scienceSimulationMathematicsEngineeringGlobal Positioning SystemGeographyChemistryTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assessment of Global Navigation Satellite Signal (GNSS) autosteering is a critical step in the progression towards full wild blueberry (vaccinium angustifolium) harvester automation. The objective of the study was to analyze John Deere’s universal Auto-Trac 300 autosteer, 4640 display, and Starfire 6000 receiver with both the SF1 and SF3 signal levels for their pass-to-pass accuracy as well as how they compared versus a manual harvester operator. Incorporation of GNSS autosteer in wild blueberry harvesting has never been assessed as the slow harvester travel speeds and small working width caused the implementation to be too challenging. The results of this study concluded that there were no significant differences in pass-to-pass accuracy based on travel speeds of 0.31 m s−1, 0.45 m s−1, and 0.58 m s−1 (p = 0.174). Comparing the signal levels showed significantly greater accuracy of the SF3 system (p < 0.001), which yielded an absolute mean pass-to-pass accuracy 22.7 mm better than SF1. Neither the SF1 nor SF3 signal levels were able to reach the levels of accuracy advertised by the manufacturer. That said, both signal levels performed better than a manual operator (p < 0.001). This result serves to support the idea that in the absence of skilled operators, an autosteer system can provide significant support for new operators. Further, an autosteer system can allow any operator to focus more of their attention on operating the harvester head and properly filling storage bins. This will lead to higher quality berries with less debris and spoilage. The results of this study are encouraging and represent a significant step towards full harvester automation for the wild blueberry crop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgronomySame topicBerry genetics and cultivation researchFrench-language works237,207